Burlesci v. Petersen
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
After plaintiff Patsy R. Burlesci presented her evidence in an action for conversion, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, imposition of a constructive trust, and an accounting, the court granted nonsuit to defendant James Cummings. 1 Burlesci appeals. We conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to Burlesci’s claims, was sufficient to avoid a nonsuit on all causes of action except fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment as to the latter claims, and otherwise…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Oakdale Village Group v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Firoozye v. Earthlink NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Mendoza v. Rast Produce Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.