Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hefty v. Strickhouser

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2008No. 2006AP1094 and 2006AP1956Published

1DissentAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.

¶ 80 (dissenting). I agree with much of the majority opinion, but I write separately because I respectfully disagree with the majority's conclusion that "the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by entering a scheduling order that incorporated a void local rule...." Majority op., ¶ 5.

I

¶ 81. I agree with a number of the majority's conclusions: To begin with, I agree with the majority's determination that "Wisconsin circuit courts have discretion to control their dockets." Majority op., ¶ 31. I further agree with the majority that "Wisconsin Stat. § 802.10 addresses 'calendar…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunter v. AES Consultants, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API