Branson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
Petitioner, Karen Branson, seeks review of an order of the Department of Employee Services (DOES) affirming an appeals examiner’s decision that Ms. Branson was ineligible for unemployment compensation. Petitioner presents four arguments. First, she contends that the appeals examiner erred by failing to address her claim that she left work because of an unhealthy working environment; second, she argues that the decision that she was ineligible for unemployment compensation was not supported by substantial evidence; third, she asserts that the appeals examiner erred by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Eilers v. District of Columbia Bureau of Motor Vehicles ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sherman v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing ArtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- District of Columbia Department of Mental Health v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dupree v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Butler-Truesdale v. AIMCO Properties, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Chimes District of Columbia, Inc. v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.