Legal Opinion
United States v. Cerna
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 26, 2009No. CR 08-0730 WHAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENSE MOTIONS TO ENFORCE BRADY AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE TIMETABLE FOR BRADY DISCLOSURES AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this federal prosecution arising out of a joint federal-state investigation, the im mediate question concerns the government’s unilateral attempt to limit the universe in which it must search for Brady materials. Another question is how to balance timely access to Brady information against the need to protect civilian witnesses. Accepting fully the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. Fort, 472 F.3d 1106 (9th…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gary Lamere v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Carriger v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fauzia Din v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LoughnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Fauzia Din v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013