Legal Opinion

Lexington Luminance LLC v. amazon.com Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 9, 2015No. 2014-1384UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Lexington Luminance LLC (“Lexington”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts construing claim 1 of U:S. Patent 6,936,851 B2 (the “'851 patent”) and granting judgment on the pleadings that the claim was indefinite. See Lexington Luminance LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 6 F.Supp.3d 179 (D.Mass.2014) (“Opinion ”). Because we conclude that the district court erred in construing the claim and in holding the claim indefinite, we vacate the judgment of invalidity and remand.

BACKGROUND

Lexington owns the '851 patent relating to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Perez Acevedo v. Rivero CubanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. In re: Neurografix ('360) Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  3. Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  4. Sap America, Inc. v. Investpic LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API