In re: Neurografix ('360) Patent Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
*208MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
STEARNS, District Judge.
This is the second wave in a Multidis-trict Litigation (MDL) involving U.S. Patent No. 5,560,360 (the ’360 patent), directed to “[a] neurography system [] for generating diagnostically useful images of neural tissue [ ] employing a modified magnetic resonance imaging [ (MRI) ] system.” ’360 patent, Abstract. In 2012, plaintiffs NeuroGrafix, Neurography Institute Medical Associates, Inc., Image-Based Surgicenter Corporation, and Dr. Aaron G. Filler, launched an armada of lawsuits against MRI equipment manufacturers and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Apple Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Google LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- NeuroGrafix v. Brainlab, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- NeuroGrafix v. Brainlab, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.