Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coucoulas/Knight Properties, LLC v. Town of Hillsborough

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 2009No. COA08-1087Published

1DissentCalabria, Judge

I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse the trial court. The majority holds that the trial court erred in concluding that the denial of plaintiff’s conditional use rezoning request unintentionally treated plaintiff in a manner different than other similarly situated applicants and was unduly discriminatory. Because I conclude that substantial evidence exists that the Board of Commissioners’ (“the Board”) denial of plaintiff’s request was unduly discriminatory, and, alternatively, that those Board members voting against the request acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chrismon v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Application of EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Guilford County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. County of Moore v. Humane Society of Moore County, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Joyce v. Winston-Salem State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API