Legal Opinion

Lillie Horton v. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company Defined Benefit Master Trust Ford Motor Company Uaw Retirement Plan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 27, 2005No. 04-4235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Ruben Horton retired from his position at Ford Motor Company, Defendant, in 1983 at age 53. After Mr. Horton’s death in 2002, Plaintiff Lillie Horton sought spousal benefits from Ford as Mr. Horton’s common law wife. Ford denied her request and she sought review from the Ford Motor Company-UAW Retirement Board of Administration (“Board”), which also denied her request on the ground that Mr. Horton elected not to provide spousal survivorship benefits. She next brought a cause of action in state court that was removed to the United States District Court for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parsley v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO DEPT. OF PUBLICDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API