Carroll v. Hughes
New York Surrogate's Court
Application by administrator for the judicial settlement of his account. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
This is an application on the part of James Hughes, who was appointed by this court administrator of the credits and effects of his brother, the Rev. Peter Hughes, deceased, for a judicial settlement of his accounts.
The Rev. Peter Hughes was domiciled, at the time of his death, in the borough of Braddocks, near Pittsburgh, in the county of Alleghany, State of Pennsylvania. He left next of kin in the State of New York and *339in Ireland ; but none in the State of Pennsylvania. His brother, James Hughes, who was at the time a resident of the city of Brooklyn, went to Braddocks,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Roderigas v. . East River Savings InstitutionNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Despard v. . ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maas v. German Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KreidlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1910
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WaughNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889