Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Stevens

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1904No. 1491PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Second District Court, Weber County. —Ron. W. M. McCarty, Judge. Action to recover on a stock subscription. The opinion states the facts. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants, indicated, appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the respondents against the appellants to recover on an alleged liability on stock subscription in the South Ogden Land, Building & Improvement Company. Appellants in their answer and cross-complaint .set up, among other things, that there was a nonjoinder of parties defendant in the action, alleging that Solomon C. Stephens, William J. Stephens, and David Kay were stockholders in said corporation at all times since the organization thereof, and were necessary parties defendant in the action, equally liable with the appellants, in proportion to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gill v. TracyUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Nelden-Judson Drug Co. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. In Re Davies' GuardianshipUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Williams v. BelnapUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API