Legal Opinion

Nelden-Judson Drug Co. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Ogden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1906No. 1670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Weber County; II. II. Rolapp> J udge. Action by the Nelden-Judson Drug Company and others against the Commercial National Bank and another. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStraub, J.

This was an action brought by the appellants as plaintiffs against the respondents as defendants, to have declared fraudulent and void a chattel mortgage executed by Shirley P. Ash in his lifetime to the defendant bank. Hume, the administrator of the estate of Shirley P. Ash, deceased, and the defendant bank, appeared in the action ,and filed separate answers and were represented by separate counsel, Heywood & McCormick representing the bank, and Henderson & Macmillan representing Hume. The case was tried before the court and findings and judgment were for the defendants. Plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Adams v. McPhersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Stephens v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gill v. TracyUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API