Legal Opinion

State v. Brice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2016No. 15-904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

*766 Defendant argues on appeal that the indictment against her was fatally defective because it failed to comply with the requirements set forth in N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-928. Defendant's petition for certiorari is allowed by this Court so that we may review the judgment entered. In accordance with State v. Williams, 153 N.C.App. 192 , 568 S.E.2d 890 (2002), we hold that the indictment was insufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the trial court. We vacate defendant's conviction for habitual misdemeanor larceny and remand for entry of judgment and sentence for misdemeanor larceny.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. FelmetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. PetersilieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API