Legal Opinion

Hoar v. Schneider Transport, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1991No. 90-CA-29PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gwin, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, James K. Hoar (“appellant”), was injured on June 8, 1981, while in the course and scope of his employment with defendantappellee, Schneider Transport, Inc. (“appellee”). Appellant filed a workers’ compensation claim and same was allowed for “acute cervical sprain and aggravation of pre-existing arthritis of the cervical area.”

On April 4, 1988, almost seven years later, appellant filed a motion under his workers’ compensation claim requesting that his claim be further allowed for a psychological condition identified as “somatoform pain disorder with depressive…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Clementi v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Edwards v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McGuire v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forster v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API