Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property At 2659 RoundHill DR.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1999No. Nos. 98-15836, 98-16207PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
The appellants are claimants (Robert Fitzstephens et al., hereinafter “purchasers”) and intervenors (World Savings and Loan Association, hereinafter “World”) in an in rem forfeiture suit brought by the government against real property. They appeal the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of the government. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In 1990, Anthony and Kathryn Payton purchased real property located at 2659 Roundhill Drive, Alamo, California (hereinafter “the property”) for $682,500. The Paytons…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel CRETACCI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Real Property Located at 20832 Big Rock Drive, Malibu, Ca 90265, Hour Holdings, Ltd., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. One Dairy Farm, Etc., Appeal of Arnaldo and Eric Ortiz CameronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Real Property At 2659 Roundhill Dr., Alamo, Ca, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999