Legal Opinion

Guerrero v. Moore

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 3, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01315Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Carlos GUERRERO, Case No.: 20-cv-01315-GPC-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION 14 [ECF No. 9] 15 T. MOORE, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Carlos Guerrero, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 19 filed this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

on July 10, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 2, 20 2020, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 21 (“IFP”) and directing the U.S. Marshal (“USMS”) to effect service on the Defendant T. 22 Moore.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Jensen v. KnowlesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  3. Bramhall v. BrosnanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API