Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Knowles

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 9, 2008No. 1:02-mj-02373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR., District Judge.

This Order addresses two motions currently before the Court. First is a motion to dismiss claims against Defendants Arthur, Brown, Hettema, Sainz, Silva, Knowles, Williams, Seinwirth, Cherry, Kernan, Hansen, Feltner and Karelas for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Docket Nos. 98 (Mot.); 98-2 (Mem.); 99 (Opp’n); 100 (Reply). Second is Plaintiffs motion requesting further efforts to serve Defendant Wathen. Docket No. 97.

I — BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Nasuti v. Dolin (In re McDonald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  4. (PC) Hammler v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Allen v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API