Jensen v. Knowles
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR., District Judge.
This Order addresses two motions currently before the Court. First is a motion to dismiss claims against Defendants Arthur, Brown, Hettema, Sainz, Silva, Knowles, Williams, Seinwirth, Cherry, Kernan, Hansen, Feltner and Karelas for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Docket Nos. 98 (Mot.); 98-2 (Mem.); 99 (Opp’n); 100 (Reply). Second is Plaintiffs motion requesting further efforts to serve Defendant Wathen. Docket No. 97.
I — BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Nasuti v. Dolin (In re McDonald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- (PC) Hammler v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Allen v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.