Kabinski v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
“The pertinent provisions of which policy are as follows: “ ‘Agreement I. To pay any loss by reason of the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries, including death at any time resulting therefrom, accidentally sustained during the policy period by any person or persons other than the employes of the assured; (a) by reason of the maintenance and operation of an automobile sales agency, garage or station, including a repair shop, if…
Read the full summary
“The pertinent provisions of which policy are as follows: “ ‘Agreement I. To pay any loss by reason of the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries, including death at any time resulting therefrom, accidentally sustained during the policy period by any person or persons other than the employes of the assured; (a) by reason of the maintenance and operation of an automobile sales agency, garage or station, including a repair shop, if any, and the making of ordinary repairs and the renewal of existing mechanical equipment; (b) or by reason of the…
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Palmer.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Pariter, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heher, Persete, Porter, IIeteielb, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Sussex Mutual Insurance v. Hala Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Clement v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.