Legal Opinion

Crump v. Lane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 6, 1986No. 85-2526PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The plaintiff, Michael Crump, appeals from the denial of his complaint brought under the Habeas Corpus Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 10—101 et seq.) Crump contends that there was an unreasonable, unexplained, six-year delay between the affirmance of his conviction and imposition of sentence which requires his release from custody and the discharge of the remainder of his sentence.

On June 14, 1974, Crump was found guilty of armed robbery and was sentenced to a term of 10 to 30 years’ imprisonment. Crump appealed the judgment of conviction and sentence and was released on an appeal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rudin v. RuddellIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People Ex Rel. Millet v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. RipaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. People v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. BartlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crump v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API