Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Standard Accident Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenyon, J.

The plaintiffs in this action by motion asked to have a counterclaim interposed by an additional defendant, George G. Josh, Inc., which is directed solely against the plaintiffs’ complaint, dismissed.

The intention of section 193, subdivision 2, of the Civil Practice Act was not to add to the burdens of the plaintiff, but to confer a privilege upon the original defendant by permitting him to frame a supplemental pleading and serve it upon the party sought to be brought in, which, if sustained, would entitle him to a judgment against the latter. (Federal Lighterage Co., Inc., v. Italia-American…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Federal Lighterage Co. v. Italia-America Shipping Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fenner v. CahnNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Broderick v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Marsh v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API