Legal Opinion
F.E.A. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 8, 2002No. 1D01-313PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPolston, J.
After an investigatory stop by a sheriffs deputy, Appellant was charged with possession of less than 20 grams of cannabis, possession of paraphernalia, and possession of an alcoholic beverage by a person under the age of 21 years. Appellant filed a motion to suppress evidence on the basis that the sheriffs deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Appellant’s vehicle, and the stop therefore violated search and seizure constitutional provisions. See U.S. Const. amend. IV; Art, I, § 12, Fla. Const. The trial court denied the motion, and Appellant pled nolo contendere as charged,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Frank Robert BriggmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. PyeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- D.T.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- R.J.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.