Legal Opinion

Coursey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1929No. 7945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

The first question to be determined in tMs ease is whether W. B. Alexander, manager of the Omaha branch of the business of the Eirto *50stone Tire «fe Rubber Company, a corporation, had authority as the agent of said company to make the agreement sued upon. The trial court held that he did not have that authority and instructed the jury to return a verdict for the company. The Firestone Tire <fe Rubber Company at the time the alleged agreement was entered into was engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobile tubes and casings, with its manufacturing plant and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schuster v. North American Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Richmond Guano Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Chickasha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Owens Bottle-Mach. Co. v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
  5. Friedman & Sons v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank Sullivan Company v. Midwest Sheet Metal WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API