Legal Opinion
Hls Bonding v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm., 07ap-1071 (8-14-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 2008No. 07AP-1071PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} HLS Bonding, dba SMD/HLS Bonding Company (hereinafter "HLS"), appeals the judgment of the trial court, which affirmed a cease and desist order of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (hereinafter "Commission") involving a retaliation claim by former employee Mark Glaser. On appeal, HLS contends that the trial court erred when it found that (1) the Commission established a prima facie case of retaliation, and (2) HLS's explanation for an adverse employment action was pretextual. Because reliable, probative, and substantial evidence supports the trial court's findings, we disagree and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- You v. Northeast Ohio Med. Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Tanksley v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Maas v. JTM Provisions Company Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Smith v. Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Claims · 2012