Legal Opinion
Baum v. Heiman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 5, 1988No. 86-2716PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
528 So.2d 63 (1988)
Abe BAUM, Individually, and As Trustee, Appellant,
v.
Ardis HEIMAN, Appellee.
No. 86-2716.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 5, 1988.
Rehearing Denied August 3, 1988.
Eliot R. Weitzman, Miami, for appellant.
Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL[*] and NESBITT, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
Abe Baum appeals a final judgment granting Ardis Heiman restitution. We reverse.
Baum lent Heiman and her husband $40,000 which was evidenced by a promissory note. After her husband died, Heiman defaulted on the loan. Baum filed an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mann v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Sundie v. HarenSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State ex rel. Hill v. HearnSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Silverman v. LichtmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Heiman v. Capital BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. LenahanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Sky Lake Gardens Recreation, Inc. v. Sky Lake Gardens No. 1, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Mace v. M&T BankDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Mace v. M&T BankDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Sky Lake Gardens Recreation, Inc. v. Sky Lake Gardens No. 1, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992