Legal Opinion
Mace v. M&T Bank
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 23, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00591Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION KENNETH MACE, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:20-cv-591-JLB-NPM M&T BANK, Defendant. ORDER Defendant M&T Bank (the “Bank”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Kenneth Mace’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Docs. 4, 8.) Mr. Mace is suing the Bank primarily for damaging a property that the Bank temporarily owned due to a foreclosure judgment and resultant sale. Both the judgment and the sale were reversed after Mr. Mace successfully appealed, but the property was returned to him in a dilapidated state.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Union Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.