Legal Opinion
Salter v. City of Anniston
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 21, 1929No. 7 Div. 918PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The bill in the instant ease presents the single question whether or not the ballot used by the electors in expressing their preference for and against the proposed bond issue (an outline of which with a copy of the ballot, appears in the report of the case), sufficiently meets the requirements of section 222. of our Constitution. The following cases have dealt with this constitutional provision: Coleman v. Town of Eutaw, 157 Ala. 327, 47 So. 703; Ryan v. Mayor, etc., Tuscaloosa, 155 Ala. 479, 46 So. 638; Realty Inv. Co. v. City of Mobile, 181 Ala. 184, 61 So. 248; Thomason v. Court of County…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. Town of EutawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Realty Investment Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Ryan v. Mayor of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Thomason v. Court of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Dent v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doody v. State Ex Rel. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- State Docks Commission v. State Ex Rel. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Storrs v. HeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Tommie v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- In re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950