Tommie v. City of Gadsden
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Complainant rests her case upon the alleged insufficiency of the official ballot used in the city election,. upon the theory that its form does not meet the requirements of section 222 of the Constitution, and much reliance is had upon Coleman v. Town of Eutaw, 157 Ala. 327, 47 So. 703., Our subsequent decisions have recognized the soundness of the Coleman Case, but the language of the opinion in its entirety has not been approved, but in a measure qualified.
In Realty Investment Co. v. Mobile, 181 Ala. 184, 61 So. 248, 249, it was noted that there may be “a substance in form…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. Town of EutawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Realty Investment Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Thomason v. Court of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Dent v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Salter v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doody v. State Ex Rel. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Deegan v. PakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Storrs v. HeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Harris v. CopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- In re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.