Legal Opinion
Briarcliff v. Briarcliff Tenants Ass'n (In Re Briarcliff)
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 30, 1981No. Civil 81-2566PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Bankruptcy Court filed July 6, 1981, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 12-43.
The debtor Briarcliff is landlord and debtor in possession of a luxury apartment building. On August 3,1977 Briarcliff filed a Chapter XII petition for real property arrangement under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 as amended. By order of the Bankruptcy Court dated August 12, 1977 Briar-cliff was designated debtor in possession.
The present controversy grows out of the debtor’s conversion of the building’s electrical metering system from a master meter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Gillis v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cullen v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Finn v. 415 Fifth Ave. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- In Re S. W. Straus & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hillis Motors, Inc. v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- 1993-1 Trade Cases P 70,285, 29 Collier bankr.cas.2d 470, Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,331 Hillis Motors, Inc., and Dallas Edward Rowley v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Taxel v. Electronic Sports Research (In Re Cinematronics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.