Legal Opinion
James F. Mullins v. Pfizer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 2, 1994No. 1266, Docket 93-7985PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff James F. Mullins appeals from a judgment entered in July 1993 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Alan H. Nevas, J., in favor of Mullins’s employer, defendant-appellee Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer), in an action arising out of Mullins's early retirement from Pfizer. The court granted Pfizer’s motion for summary judgment on all counts of Mullins’s amended complaint.
Lurking in the background of this case are a number of significant issues of law concerning the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Coan v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Martinez v. Schlumberger, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Faircloth v. Lundy Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Clay K. James v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.