Vider v. Ferguson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, for money paid. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
The first question presented is whether there was a legal declaration .of forfeiture by the defendant Ferguson, and we are of the opinion that there was not. The plaintiff made the first or cash payment on each of the contracts. The first deferred payment on the contract of August 18, 1894, $3,105, was due August 18, 1895, and no part of it was paid until Becember 12, 1895, when plaintiff paid, and Bosworth, defendant’s agent, received, $1,500 on account of it. This was the last payment made on account of the deferred installments of the purchase money.
The semi-annual interest on the deferred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Palmer v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Burroughs v. ClanceyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Allen v. WoodruffIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Harris v. TroupNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Bryson v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Castle v. ArmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Woodard v. Willamette Val. Irr. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Craft v. CalmeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
- Donovan v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Tucker v. BeamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.