Legal Opinion
Vardeman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1933No. A-8461PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Okfuskee county of the crime of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed by the court at) imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.
It is contended that the failure of the court to- permit counsel for defendant to- examine generally each prospective juror individually was prejudicial to- him.
The record discloses that on the general examination of prospective jurors the court said:
“Not a single member in the box knew the defendant, and no-t one knew anything about the facts in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cudjoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Cloud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Paschall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Stott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.