Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Foretich
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 5, 1988No. 86-1615, 87-33, 87-936, 87-942 and 87-987PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
The formal parties to this appeal are the divorced parents of a daughter, H, the ultimate real party in interest. She was bom in 1982. On November 8, 1984, appellant Morgan was awarded custody of H and appellee Foretich was given liberal visitation. Almost continuously since that date, the parties have been in litigation on these issues, with numerous appeals to this court and two published opinions. See Morgan v. Foretich, 521 A.2d 248 (D.C.1987) (Morgan I), and 528 A.2d 425 (D.C.1987) (Morgan II). Now before us is an appeal from an order of August 19, 1987,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morgan v. ForetichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mokhiber v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- McClurkin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Foretich v. Capital Cities/Abc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Foretich v. CBS, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Morgan v. ForetichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Reale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.