Legal Opinion

Whitley v. O'NEAL

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 692SC128PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.

In oral argument in this Court, the defendant’s entered a demurrer ore tenus on the ground that the plaintiffs’ complaint does not state a cause of action. There is some confusion as to what theory plaintiffs are relying upon in seeking relief. Their complaint, apparently, attempts to set forth a cause of action based upon fraud. North Carolina does not follow the strict rule that a party must succeed, if at all, only upon the theory set forth in his pleading. “This strict rule savors of the technicalities of the common law system; and North Carolina follows the more liberal view that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Hoyle v. BagbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Brogden v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Cook v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Newby v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Brookland, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Laurie v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Allen v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Bumgarner v. TomblinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Brandis v. Lightmotive Fatman, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API