State v. Rodden
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BIEGELMEIER, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of attempted burglary. On appeal he asserts the trial court erred by proceeding under SDCL 16-13-43 in procuring additional jurors after the panel had been exhausted, claiming it denied defendant due process of law and equal protection of the law. SDCL 16-13 provides for the compilation of a jury list from which jurors are selected for service in the various courts. It is from this list that jurors are drawn and summoned to appear in a number designated by judges of courts involved. This group is referred to as the regular panel.
It appears this panel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- People v. SicilianoIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Losieau v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Negra v. L. Lion & Sons Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. McCambrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Whitepipe v. WeberDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007