Legal Opinion

Rose v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2001No. C9-01-884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

The trial court sustained the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license. Appellant Steven Rose challenges the trial court’s admission of a breath test, contending that the police officer who stopped him did not have an articulable basis to do so. Because there is merit in appellant’s contention, we reverse.

FACTS

On December 12, 2000, Elk River Police Officer Olmscheid received a call from a Sherburne County dispatcher about a possible intoxicated driver. The dispatcher reported that an employee from Beaudry Express, an Elk River gas station, reported that a possible…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Olson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Yoraway v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State of Minnesota v. Cynthia Jayne Holmes-BuscherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API