Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 2006No. A05-857PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

After receiving complaints of odors of drugs from apartment-complex employees, law-enforcement officers performed a dog sniff in a common hallway of appellant’s apartment. The dog alerted to the odor of illegal drugs. The officers then obtained and executed a search warrant and seized drugs and drug paraphernalia from appellant’s apartment. The district court denied appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from the search. On appeal, appellant argues that the dog sniff was a search that required probable cause or, alternatively, that a reasonable, articu-lable…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. NguyenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. DumstreyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API