Legal Opinion

Pulte Computer Corp. v. Debus

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 14, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OToole.J.

In this action for goods sold and delivered, the defendant moved to quash service of process and to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Dist./Mun. R. Civ. P., Rule 12(b) (2), or in the alternative to dismiss the complaint by reason of the doctrine offorum non conveniens. The motion was denied, and thejudge’s ruling was reported to the Appellate Division forreview. We affirm the denial of the motion in both its aspects.

I

To set the stage with facts, we quote thejudge’s Report:

The undisputed evidence indicates that plaintiff, Pulte Computer Corporation,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. W.R. Grace & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API