Legal Opinion

Titlow v. Titlow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. In the court below this was a feigned issue, directed by the Register’s Court, to try whether certain paper writings were the will of Abraham Titlow, deceased. The papers were a will dated July 18th, a codicil dated August 4th, and a codicil dated August 11th 1863. They were admitted to probate by the register on the 25th of June 1864, and letters testamentary granted to David Titlow, the executor named in the will.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. In the court below this was a feigned issue, directed by the Register’s Court, to try whether certain paper writings were the will of Abraham Titlow, deceased. The papers were a will dated July 18th, a codicil dated August 4th, and a codicil dated August 11th 1863. They were admitted to probate by the register on the 25th of June 1864, and letters testamentary granted to David Titlow, the executor named in the will. The will gave to his niece, Alcenia Schuyler, $6000, and a mortgage of $1000, the residue of his estate, to be distributed…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Strong, J.

The principal questions submitted to the jury in this case were whether Abraham Titlow was of sound mind on the 18th of July, on the 4th of August and on the 11th of August 1863, when the alleged will and codicils were made, and whether those instruments were made under the pressure of undue influence. By inquisition taken in 1864 he was found a lunatic, and found to have been such from the 25th day of June 1863, but with lucid intervals. On the trial, the defendants below, now plaintiffs in error, in order to show either mental unsoundness…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunham's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Crane v. Town of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  3. Hutchinson v. SandtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  4. Heister v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1792

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sterrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Aggas v. MunnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Lanning WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Burns v. KabboulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Taylor v. TrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API