Legal Opinion
In re Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 13, 2014No. 14-12422-BPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
Petitioner Wellcare Health Plans, Inc. (“Wellcare”) seeks a writ of mandamus declaring it a “victim” within the meaning of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, and directing the district court to act accordingly.
After review of the record and the briefs of the parties, we deny Wellcare’s petition.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Underlying Criminal Conduct
The U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida filed a criminal information charging petitioner Wellcare with conspiring through its former…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. United States, United States v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Drummond Co. v. CollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Arlene Anne Townsend v. Rubin SchronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- In Re: IIG Structured Trade Fin. Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2026
- Travis J. Moody v. Scott Bessent, et al.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.