Legal Opinion

Arlene Anne Townsend v. Rubin Schron

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 9, 2017No. 16-15055 Non-Argument CalendarUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Estate of Arlene Anne Townsend (the “Estate”) petitioned the Middle District of Florida for a writ of mandamus as part of the Estate’s ongoing efforts to compel the district’s bankruptcy court to remand a pending motion to the Florida state court system. The district court denied the Estate’s petition for this “extraordinary remedy.” After full consideration of the parties’ arguments, we conclude for the reasons discussed below that the petition was properly denied and that the decision of the district court is due to be AFFIRMED.

I. Background

Although the full history of this litigation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Continental National Bank of Miami v. Sanchez (In Re Toledo)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re: Bellsouth Corporation, in Re: Terry Price and Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price & Proctor, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. 23 Collier bankr.cas.2d 999, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,616 in the Matter of Lemco Gypsum, Inc., Debtor. Lawrence E. Miller, Jr., Miller Resources, Inc. v. Kemira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mendez v. 942 Penn RR, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API