Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. Seattle-First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1977No. 44325PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This is a case of interpretation of Washington's pretermitted heir statute, RCW 11.12.090. We granted review because there are two decisions of this court apparently in conflict on the singular issue presented. That issue is, as stated by the Court of Appeals: When a child of a testatrix was deceased at the time the will was made and the testatrix neither named nor provided for the deceased child or one of the descendants of the deceased child, does RCW 11.12.090 require that the testatrix be deemed to have died intestate as to the deceased child? In re Estate of Hastings, 15 Wn. App. 300,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re Hebb's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Gehlen v. GehlenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In Re Harper's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Halle's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of TolsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Prince v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Matter of Estate of HiltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re the Estate of MarshallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Malloy v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API