Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1998No. 64873-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

In this appeal we are asked to determine *318whether a testator’s penciled-in cancellation of a trust provision and of a specific bequest is effective as a “partial revocation” of her will or is an alteration or modification of the will and, therefore, subject to the formalities required for the execution of wills. We hold that an attempted revocation which significantly alters the design or result of a will creates a new will which must be executed and attested to according to the requirements of RCW 11.12.020.

The testator’s attempted revocation in this case resulted in a significant change in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. MilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. In Re Estate of AppletonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re the Estate of BecklundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of MalloyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re the Trust of Mable Meeks, aka L/M Meeks No. 1 TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. White v. DidricksenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Estate Of Ray Merle BurtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API