Amber Zaneta Crutchfield v. Nancy A. Berryhill
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMBER C.,1 Case No. 2:19-cv-03208-MAA 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND 13 v. ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER 14 15 ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On April 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social 20 Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Supplemental 21 Security Income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This matter is 22 fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.