Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Mullin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 19, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, V. C.

This is a demurrer to a bill for specific performance. The bill alleges a written agreement to convey land in Newark by deed of warranty free from all encumbrance. It states that this land *453is subject to a right of way and then it charges that through mutual mistake there was an omission to mention in the writing that it was so burdened. The prayer is for reformation and for performance of the agreement as reformed.

Unless I undertake to overrule the case of Wirtz v. Guthrie, 81 N. J. Eq. (11 Buch.) 271, I must sustain the demurrer. Vice-Chancellor Emery there holds that an…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. BolishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Gross v. YeskelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. McKinney v. MuirNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  5. Myers v. VogtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API