People v. Kanefsky

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

Defendant Bernard Kanefsky was convicted, after a jury trial, of one count of receiving unlawful gratuities. (Penal Law, § 200.35.) After rendition of the verdict, defendant *164moved, pursuant to CPL 330.30 (subd 1), to set aside such verdict, arguing, inter alia, that a small pocket appointment book kept by one Roberto, an individual co-operating with law enforcement officials, was improperly withheld from him and should have been produced in response to a subpoena duces tecum. The only significant issue presented to us is whether this claimed impropriety mandates…