ACCO Brands, Inc. v. PC Guardian Anti-Theft Products, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On October 22, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiffs motion and DENIES defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
The Court described the facts of this case in its March 19, 2008 Order, 2008 WL 753899 denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2009