Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — Wilbur and Josephine Hallauer contend the trial court and Court of Appeals erred when each dismissed their complaint to condemn a private way of necessity, and a majority of our court agrees a private right of condemnation is available under these circumstances. Specifically, the issue here is whether a certified water right entitles private parties to condemn land “necessary” to utilize that water right notwithstanding other sources of water available for their use absent condemnation.
A. Const. art. I, § 16, and chapter 8.24 RCW
The Washington Constitution generally prohibits…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Champion v. Shoreline School District No. 412Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Brown v. McAnallyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Department of Ecology v. AdsitWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Crescent Harbor Water Co. v. LysengCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.