Legal Opinion

Department of Ecology v. Adsit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1985No. 50825-9PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Circle C Ranch, and various parties representing it, appeal from a finding of the trial court that cer tain water rights claims made under the 1967 water rights act by the ranch were improperly filed and that no water rights accrued to the ranch by virtue of the improper filing. We reverse the trial court and hold that, under some circumstances, the doctrine of substantial compliance may be used to meet the requirements of the act.

The 1967 water rights act was designed to eliminate uncertainty as to the existence of private water claims and to assist in enforcement of the beneficial use of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hart v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API