Legal Opinion

Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. Coupard

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 23, 1985No. 12 (Adv.), September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this case we sustain, against a variety of challenges, the constitutionality of an aspect of the statute of repose applicable to claims, including claims for indemnity, resulting from the defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property. While the challenges implicate the current statute as a whole, this case is specifically concerned with the statute as it stood in the twelve months prior to an amendment effective July 1, 1980.

Md.Code (1974, 1980 Repl.Vol.), § 5-108 (the Act) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (Courts Article) provided:

§ 5-108.…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API