Legal Opinion

State v. Kolisch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2002No. PR116471; A116109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*420LANDAU, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment imposing a fine for speeding, based on evidence from a photo radar unit. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to enter a judgment of acquittal, because there was insufficient notice that a photo radar unit was in operation. According to defendant, the lack of sufficient notice rendered the citation invalid. The state argues that the statute that sets out the requirements of a valid citation does not include such a notice requirement. We agree with the state and affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant drove south on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Severy v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. O'MARA v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. BonhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Wright v. Professional Services Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. KolischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API