Legal Opinion

Gaudin v. K. D. I. Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 9, 1976No. C-1-75-173PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon two motions, the motion of defendant KDI Corporation 1 (hereinafter KDI) for summary judgment, and the motion of defendants Cors, Hair and Hartsock and Charles F. Hartsock (hereinafter Hartsock) for summary judgment. The parties have submitted memoranda, affidavits and exhibits in support of their respective positions. These motions are made pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., and for the Court to grant such motions it must find “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,100 Donald J. Robertson v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Zemcik v. LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Haynes v. Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  5. Au Rustproofing Center, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API